The government’s
decision was made after years of severe nationwide
debate, division and cross-industry bickering. The government contended that
the deregulation was for producing better contents
that would help the Korean media companies strengthen international
competitiveness and become global media companies.
However, there had
been widespread concern over not only the deleterious effects of the new channels on journalism
such as the harm to diversity in public opinion but
also the thinly-stretched budgets of advertisers.
Although it was very questionable
whether the market could create additional TV advertising spots from
advertisers, the government claimed that the new channels would generate enough
advertising revenue. However, they
have been operating at a loss due to the very low viewer ratings and poor
advertising spots. Even though the new channels have
greatly lowered their price for advertising spots, they are keeping “drowning
in red ink.”
The government and the newspapers really
did not know that television advertising is price inelastic? Or, just because
of the political thinking, they were blind to media economics? This study will explore how the newspapers depicted the new cable TV channels, which show whether and how much they concentrated on media economics perspective regarding their approach to new business model.
<Research
Question>
RQ1: What
differences, if any, were there in Korean major newspapers’ frames of the new
cable TV channels?
RQ2: What differences, if any, were there in Korean
major newspapers’ tone of stories about the new cable TV channels?
RQ2a: What differences, if any, were
there in Korean major newspapers’ tone of the
frame used most frequently?
RQ3: When Korean
major newspapers covered the new cable TV channels, what sources did Korean
major newspapers mainly depend on?
RQ4: When Korean
major newspapers covered the new cable TV channels, to what extent was such
coverage based on media economics data?
No comments:
Post a Comment